Every QA specialist understands the concept of automated software testing, the advantages it brings, and the challenges it entails. However, individuals in smaller organizations or those responsible for a straightforward or solitary product may find themselves limited to manual functional testing and regression testing.
Amidst the push for automation, we urge you to thoroughly contemplate your automation goals and what criteria will gratify your superior in terms of the automation endeavor. Without comprehending your objectives, it would be arduous to gauge the degree of success achieved. To aid in this process, it proves beneficial to compile and comprehend the advantages of test automation as a means of establishing your goals.
Typically, automation expedites the pace of the testing procedure and reduces the duration of the testing cycle.
You can execute scripts during nighttime, effectively simulating a day and night shift scenario.
Scripts can operate concurrently on multiple machines and platforms.
Scripts complete their execution faster compared to manual testers.
Allocate your skills and time in the most strategic manner possible.
Manual testing can be directed towards validating new features, while automation can handle regression testing.
The majority of functional and regression testing can be carried out without requiring constant human supervision.
Direct your efforts towards areas that previously lacked sufficient time, such as performance and security testing.
It becomes possible to assess how the software responds when subjected to repeated execution of identical operations.
Conduct identical tests across multiple configurations, including diverse settings.
Regression suites can encompass every feature within your application, which may prove challenging to accomplish manually, especially considering the size of your application.
Varying versions can leverage the same automation code with minor adjustments for efficient reuse.
Subsequently, it's advisable to grasp the obstacles you face, not only to equip yourself with the appropriate inquiries when automation vendors approach you but also to establish practical expectations as you solidify your automation goals.
Not all tools are identical, and not all tools are compatible with your software. Your software's architecture and platform determine the suitability of various tools. While any tool might suffice, some prove more user-friendly than others, and achieving all objectives may not be feasible.
If the user interface undergoes frequent changes, developing scripts with robust architecture becomes arduous, leading to script maintenance challenges.
In scenarios where customized controls are employed by programmers instead of standard Windows controls (e.g., dropdown lists, input boxes, etc.), automating testing becomes exceedingly difficult due to the inherent recognition issues faced by any tool. As a result, testing the functions and specialized features of such controls poses a significant challenge.
When the setup of the designated objective test system necessitates manual intervention and configuration, recovering from errors within the tested product becomes intricate. Consequently, this compels manual monitoring of automated test execution, undermining a portion of the purpose behind automation.
One of the most recent developments in addressing these difficulties involves the utilization of machine learning and AI in automating tests. To illustrate, when confronted with unstable user interfaces, artificial intelligence endeavors permit the scripts to autonomously rectify themselves and locate suitable entities. They can even acquire knowledge of button appearances and find comparable alternatives. Nevertheless, even if the scripts possess self-healing abilities, it remains imperative for a human evaluator to verify the correctness of the repairs.
Additional areas where machine learning and artificial intelligence are employed include identifying the optimal focal points for automation endeavors and determining the most productive or efficacious regions for manual testing. All of these initiatives are currently at different stages of advancement. Similar to a decade ago when vendors were promoting their codeless automation tools, it is important to be mindful of the superficial attractiveness and pledges.
Choose the right automation testing tool that can help in performing tests. Consider the tool's ease of use, compatibility with different platforms and languages, and reporting mechanism.
WeTest provides the ultimate test automation tool that guarantees the highest quality for your software products. Our unique features make us stand out from the rest:
1. 1000+ Device Models: Test your native mobile app on real iOS and Android devices, including Apple, Samsung, Pixel, Xiaomi, and Huawei.
2. DevOps Integration: WeTest seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools, allowing you to trigger automated tests with every build action.
3. Parallel Test Execution: Release your app 10x faster by executing tests in parallel across multiple devices on the WeTest cloud.
4. Comprehensive Test Analysis: Get all your test results in one view, and debug your mobile app using logs, video recordings, screenshots, case analyses, device analysis, and performance analysis.